Stomatológ 2024, 34(1):36-39 | DOI: 10.69658/sto.2024.007

Specific interactions of magnetic resonance imaging and materials used in orthodontics

Ľubomír Gazdík1,2,*, Juraj Lysý3, Viera Lehotská1
1 II. Rádiologická klinika LF UK a OÚSA Bratislava
2 Ortodoncia Gazdík, s.r.o. Dolný Kubín
3 Klinika stomatológie a maxilofaciálnej chirurgie LF UK Bratislava

Nuclear magnetic resonance has become an essential diagnostic tool in medicine. Interactions between the magnetic field of the tomograph and materials used in orthodontic treatment can lead to adverse effects and a decrease in the diagnostic value of the examination. This article provides an overview of the issue with implications for clinical practice - it describes types of interactions and focuses on the specifics of their occurrence. It discusses options for influencing them and finally, it summarizes available guidelines from orthodontic associations regarding the examination of orthodontic patients using magnetic resonance imaging.

Keywords: magnetic resonance imaging, artifact, magnetic susceptibility, orthodontic appliance, fixed retainer

Published: June 26, 2024  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Gazdík Ľ, Lysý J, Lehotská V. Specific interactions of magnetic resonance imaging and materials used in orthodontics. Stomatológ. 2024;34(1):36-39. doi: 10.69658/sto.2024.007.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Beau, A., Bossard, D., Gebeile-Chauty, S.: Magnetic resonance imaging artefacts and fixed orthodontic attachments. The European Journal of Orthodontics, 2015, 37.1: 105-110. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    2. Blankenstein, F., Truong, B. T., Thomas, A., et al.: Predictability of magnetic susceptibility artifacts from metallic orthodontic appliances in magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of OrofacialOrthopedics/Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie, 2015, 76.1: 14-29. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    3. Blankenstein, F. H., Asbach, P., Beuer, F., et al.: Magnetic permeability as a predictor of the artefact size caused by orthodontic appliances at 1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging. Clinical oral investigations, 2017, 21: 281-289. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    4. Costa, A. L., Appenzeller, S., Yasuda, C. L.: Artifacts in brain magnetic resonance imaging due to metallic dental objects. Medicina Oral Patologia Oral Y CirugiaBucal, 2009, 14.6: 278-282.
    5. Eliades, G., Eliades, T., Brantley, W.A., et al.: Dental materials in vivo: aging and related phenomena. Chicago: Quintessence, 2003.
    6. Elison, J. M., Leggitt, V. L., Thomson, M., et al.: Influence of common orthodontic appliances on the diagnostic quality of cranial magnetic resonance images. American Journal of Orthodontics and DentofacialOrthopedics, 2008, 134.4: 563-572. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    7. Görgülü, S., Ayyildiz, S., Kamburoglu, K., et al.: Effect of orthodontic brackets and different wires on radiofrequency heating and magnetic field interactions during 3-T MRI. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, 2014, 43.2: 20130356. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    8. Kemper, J., Klocke, A., Kahl-Nieke, B., et al: Kieferorthopädische Brackets in der Hochfeld-Magnetresonanz-Tomographie: Experimentelle Beurteilung magnetischer Anziehungs-und Rotationskräfte bei 3 Tesla. In: RöFo-Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart. New York, 2005. p. 1691-1698. Go to original source...
    9. Klocke, A., Kahl-Nieke, B., Adam, G.: Magnetic forces on orthodontic wires in high field magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 3 Tesla. Journal of OrofacialOrthopedics/Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie, 2006, 67.6: 424-429. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    10. Kolind, S. H., MacKay, A. L., Munk, P. L., et al.: Quantitative evaluation of metal artifact reduction techniques. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging: An Official Journal of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2004, 20.3: 487-495. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    11. Mathew, C. A., Maller, S., Maheshwaran: Interactions between magnetic resonance imaging and dental material. Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2013, 5.Suppl 1: S113. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    12. Mechl, M., Žižka, J., Tintěra, J., et al.: Kontraindikace a rizika vyšetření pomocí magnetické rezonance. Ces Radiol, 2010, 64.1: 69-75.
    13. Murakami, S., Verdonschot, R. G., Kataoka, M., et al.: A standardized evaluation of artefacts from metallic compounds during fast MR imaging. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, 2016, 45.8: 20160094. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    14. Neela, P.K., Tatikonda, V.K., Syed, M.W., et al.: Influence of orthodontic brackets and permanent retainers on the diagnostic image quality of MRI scans: a preliminary study. Dental and Medical Problems, 2021, 58.4: 499-508. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    15. Regier, M., Kemper, J., Kaul, M. G., et al.: Radiofrequency-induced heating near fixed orthodontic appliances in high field MRI systems at 3.0 Tesla. Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics/Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie, 2009, 70.6: 485-494. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    16. Różyło-Kalinowska, I., Walawska, B., Predko-Engel, A., et al.: Magnetic resonance imaging in orthodontic patients. Guidelines of the Polish Orthodontic Society (PTO), the Polish Medical Radiological Society (PLTR), and the Polish Dental Association (PTS). Journal of Stomatology, 2019, 72(1), 1-3.
    17. Schenck, JF.: The role of magnetic susceptibility in magnetic resonance imaging: MRI magnetic compatibility of the first and second kinds. Medical physics, 1996, 23.6: 815-850. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    18. Shalish, M., Dykstein, N., Friedlander-Barenboim, S.: Influence of common fixed retainers on the diagnostic quality of cranial magnetic resonance images. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2015, 147.5: 604-609. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    19. Shivam, R., Rogers, S., Drage, N.: An Evidence-based Protocol for the Management of Orthodontic Patients Undergoing MRI Scans. Orthodontic Update, 2021, 14, 32-35. Go to original source...
    20. Slovenská ortodontická spoločnosť - odborné stanovisko pre vyšetrovanie pacientov s fixnými ortodontickými aparátmi magnetickou rezonanciou. https://orto.sk/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Stanovisko-MRI-konec.pdf
    21. Song, H.-O., Yang, O.-N., Lee, S.-H., et al.: Distortion of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Different Types of Orthodontic Material. Journal of Digital Convergence, 2014, 12.2: 439-446. Go to original source...
    22. Wezel, J., Kooij, BJ., Webb, AG.: Assessing the MR compatibility of dental retainer wires at 7 Tesla. Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2014, 72.4: 1191-1198. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    23. Zachriat, C., Asbach, P., Blankenstein, K. I., et al.: MRI with intraoral orthodontic appliance-a comparative in vitro and in vivo study of image artefacts at 1.5 T. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, 2015, 44.6: 20140416. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content